What's going on in Siberia
Forest fires in Siberia: the disaster that is hardly noticed
+++ Column "Everything in the green area" +++
When the Arctic burned last year, the news turned over: coniferous forests in the northern polar circle, in the coldest regions of the world, in bright flames. That appeared new. A blazing beacon of the climate crisis - and fresh fuel for the protests of the Fridays for Future movement. Rightly. Because there has always been fire in Siberia in the summer. It has also long been known that average temperatures in the Arctic rise faster than anywhere else on earth. But the dimension of the fires was indeed historical. And they are examples of feedback effects that are as dangerous as they are difficult to calculate and that cause climate researchers to frown deep worries.
Forest fires release huge amounts of carbon dioxide
With peaks well over 30 degrees, the Arctic is experiencing an unprecedented stress test. Not only trees are burning, but also peat soils, in which carbon dioxide has been stored for 15,000 years. Permafrost thaws and releases not only the CO2 but also methane, which is far more harmful to the climate. Gigantic amounts of greenhouse gases and other pollutants also heat up the climate - and thus contribute to even more fires in the future.
This future is not sometime. But now: According to researchers, the fires in Arctic Russia in June and July alone released more carbon dioxide than in any full forest fire season since records began in 2003.
New negative records lose their news value
But strange: The ongoing catastrophe hardly plays a role in the reporting. Two possible explanations arise. They affect our view of the climate crisis as a whole:
The first is obvious: the coverage of the corona pandemic overshadows everything else. The risk of infection in the office or supermarket is more interesting than a fire in the almost deserted expanse of Siberia. This is understandable because the Covid-19 virus is a concrete threat to our health and that of our relatives and friends. But the longer the Corona crisis lasts, the greater the risk that the more serious and long-lasting climate crisis will be pushed out of our consciousness. And it slips back down on the priority list of politics.
The second explanation also concerns our perception: We have got used to the “new abnormal”. Reports of furious fires, as recently in Australia, on the Amazon or in Siberia, of record heat waves and droughts, of devastating storms and floods have lost their news value (and appeal). We are, so to speak, oversaturated with climate catastrophes. It is not cynical to state that devastating weather anomalies and disasters of global proportions are normal in the age of climate crisis. And it won't come at some point. She is already here.#Subjects
- What is Gaussian distribution or normal distribution
- Can EVM be hacked
- How do DC voltage regulators work
- What are some interesting B2B startups
- Firefox will be the best browser in 2020
- What do you like about Thailand
- Jumbo loans require mortgage insurance
- Helps drinking water with cholesterol
- Do the Africans know something about Vietnam
- Have you been busy lately?
- How high is your IQ
- Wittgenstein was a good architect
- Want to help the homeless
- What is nationalism for Giuseppe Mazzini
- Should I join IIM Udaipur
- Which flower symbolizes purity
- Where did the Polynesian people come from?
- Does Google Map work properly in Indonesia?
- What are the most famous French saints
- Is crypto trading profitable
- How was your travel experience in Indonesia
- What is considered the best novel
- How should a 35-year-old behave
- Which field is machine learning
- Do dogs have a favorite person?
- What makes you hesitate
- London has a flag
- What is outsourcing used for?
- Am I bisexual or just confused
- Causes Horlick's cancer
- What are some inexpensive watches
- Is it worth it to have Honor Mobile
- What are the basic rules of fashion
- Why don't so many people like me