Gifted students should be taught separately
Dr. Catharina Banneck, born in 1981, teaches German and politics at a grammar school in Berlin. She worked in teacher training at the HU Berlin and the FU Berlin and from 2018 to 2020 as an inspector in the Berlin school inspection. As a textbook author and in school work, her focus is on quality development, with particular attention to the quality of teaching.
Internal differentiation in the classroom from the point of view of a teacherThere is now consensus that pupils have very different requirements in the classroom and should be encouraged accordingly. But how can a teacher do justice to the 25 to 35 students who sit in front of her as individually as possible? What tools are available for this and why do colleagues still find it difficult to fall back on them from time to time?
Pupils bring different requirements and interests, experiences and skills to school. Some are enthusiastic about the performing game and thus open up literary texts. Others seek the challenge of solving tricky logic tasks. Some children need support and motivation to solve cognitively more demanding tasks, for example in the field of natural sciences, but they are convincing in sporting competitions or in musical presentations. Still other students lack the basic knowledge of the German language due to personal experience in order to be able to follow the lessons. Today schools must and want to meet all these different starting skills, learning needs or preferences in order to do justice to the learners. This applies to primary and secondary schools as well as to adult education. A heterogeneous student body needs lessons that understand diversity as a challenge and not as an obstacle. All pupils should be able to acquire competencies in their speed and on their way that lead them to a school leaving certificate and enable them to fully participate in our society.
Heterogeneity in the classroom - always a reality
[…] In addition, homogeneous student performance does not mean that other student characteristics also match. So cognitively strong students can e.g. For example, children with poor behavior can be very difficult to behave, or underperforming children may prove to be very creative or social. Seen in this way, the common pursuit of homogeneous groups of pupils is a highly dubious undertaking [...]. It is high time to understand and use heterogeneity in the classroom as a productive resource for education and upbringing. This is just as fair as it is future-oriented. "
Heinz Klippert, economist and educator, in: Ders. (2012): Heterogeneity in the classroom. How teachers can deal with it effectively and in a time-saving manner, 3. unchangeable. Ed., Weinheim and Basel, p. 24 f.
Consequences of the diversity of learning requirements for the lessonFor a long time, the idea of a good school was based on the idea that certain subject-specific content was conveyed in the classroom by the teacher and that the pupils absorb, understand and apply them. In this context, a lack of knowledge of the subject matter was attributed to cognitive deficits and / or a lack of motivation on the part of the students.
However, this understanding of learning is out of date, as numerous studies show, and no longer meets the social requirements that children and young people, but also we as adults, encounter today in a globalized and digitized world. The ability to acquire content independently and to acquire skills in a self-directed learning process has become an indispensable part of our individual educational biography. This applies to people of all ages. Every day we are faced with the challenge of sifting through a mass of information, checking it, evaluating it and, if necessary, discarding it in order to be able to form a well-founded judgment that we may also present to others and that guides our actions. Students have to practice these skills first. They must be introduced to their increasing independence and maturity. The school takes on this task.
Numerous studies in educational psychology, empirical pedagogy and teaching-learning research have shown that every person - and thus every single child and every single adolescent - grasps and understands the world in his / her own way. Accordingly, each child's acquisition of knowledge and / or skills takes place differently. All students in a class create individual "constructions", even if they deal with the same content in class. This means that they absorb the content differently, process it and embed it individually in their thinking structures. These findings have far-reaching consequences for teaching.
In today's pedagogical (teacher) training the "constructivist" idea dominates that learning can only meaningfully be carried out by an individual on the basis of his or her own experiences, impressions, interests, abilities or skills. It must therefore be a condition for good teaching that the teacher regards learning as an individual process of the students and takes into account their individual requirements in the lesson planning. Pupils learn better if they can choose tasks, social forms or methodological approaches in class that suit their skills, previous knowledge and interests. Individualized learning also focuses on increasing the students' motivation and improving their skills in self-directed learning by setting their own goals, pursuing them and realistically assessing their performance and competencies, as well as participating in the design of learning paths and lessons. The educationalists Wischer and Trautmann put it as follows: "The school should adapt to the child, and not the other way around." But how can a teacher teach and support a good 25 to 35 students per class as individually as possible in typical everyday secondary school life? Is that possible?
Teaching in a differentiated wayA sensible and well-documented way to do justice to the individual talents of the learner is to teach in a differentiated manner. That means that the pupils from the teacher within the study group can also be promoted individually. One speaks here of an inner differentiation of the learners in a basically heterogeneous learning group in contrast to the so-called external differentiationwhich aims to form learning groups that are as homogeneous as possible, i.e. uniform according to certain criteria, and to gear lessons often to the presented average performance level of the students (see info box).
What is "external differentiation"?
The German school system is dominated by a form of external differentiation that can also be found around the world: learners depending on age assigns to certain grades (also "grades": 1, 2, 3… 11, 12, 13). An external differentiation based on different interests or cognitive performance of pupils, on the other hand, can be organized in different ways. Traditionally, it takes place in Germany by distributing pupils to different types of secondary school (Hauptschule, Realschule, Gymnasium).
But also in the "integrated" school forms that exist today in almost all federal states (comprehensive schools, community schools, secondary schools, etc.), there is mostly an external differentiation. In this case it happens within of the individual school by dividing the children into Groups with similar learning speeds, which are known as level courses. Many secondary schools in Berlin, for example, divide the classes of the year or the class association in certain subjects into GR courses (basic) and ER courses (extension courses). In this way, the class structure is broken down into individual subjects, and the pupils can learn in one subject together with similarly high-performing pupils from other classes. The transitions between the groups are mostly fluid; a change between the courses is often possible after the half-year or a school year if the pupils show appropriate performance.
Discussion about internal differentiation in practice: typical objections and insightsBasically, the meaningfulness of internally differentiated teaching is no longer questioned today. In research and in practice in schools, there is broad agreement that students should be given the best possible support with regard to their individual learning requirements in order to develop and expand the ability to learn independently, which is important for the entire educational career, and to increase their motivation through the Increase participation in the learning process. Teacher training - both at universities and during the clerkship - deepens knowledge of suitable, subject-specific materials and methods in the seminars. Even high schools, which, given their comparatively homogeneous student body, were initially not as inclined to work with forms of internal differentiation as the secondary schools with their mixed student body, have often said goodbye. one Lessons for all To give to pupils. Because it is also true at grammar schools that lessons geared towards the "average student" can overwhelm some students, others cannot be challenged; for others, the learning path may not be suitable and therefore not very motivating, which reduces the learning success. In school practice, however, there is always disagreement and a need for discussion, particularly on two points relating to internal differentiation. In the following I bring them to the point with a typical statement and briefly discuss them:
- (1) "External differentiation is completely sufficient to do justice to the different abilities and skills of the learners!"
In short: what added value does the internal differentiation have compared to the external differentiation?
- (2) "It is impossible to make individual learning offers with 30 students per class!"
"How am I supposed to create internal differentiation in a full-time position as a teacher that is already busy?"
In short: What is the relationship between effort and benefit in internally differentiated teaching?
Internal differentiation can be part of very different methods, social forms and teaching concepts
Hans Werner Heymann, mathematician and educationalist, in: Ders. (2010): Binnendifferenzierung - ein Utopie ?, in: Pädagogik (11/2010), p. 6 f.
Internal differentiation in the classroom - a method kit for teachersIn the following, I would like to show that internally differentiated teaching cannot always only be implemented with a lot of organizational and personnel effort, using a method kit from practice.  For this purpose, I briefly explain the main variants of differentiation and individual, tried and tested instruments (see overview in the info box) and supplement these with references to specific, tried and tested and documented teaching projects. The instruments are neither complete nor is the assignment to the individual variants rigid. It applies to all instruments that the teachers should allow sufficient time for the evaluation or discussion and for securing the results obtained by the students. Because only with the help of a more extensive reflection of the learning process at the beginning can particularly sustainable learning effects be achieved with internally differentiated teaching.
- How do you dispose of bacon fat
- What do you think of topless sunbathing
- What is web presence
- Which languages are spoken in surprising places?
- Why did Bethesda let Skyrim go unfinished
- Does sex need physical strength or endurance
- Indonesians eat Nasi Padang for breakfast
- Does Quora really care about false names
- What is the curse of your existence
- You can direct a message on Quora
- Will WordPress continue to grow in 2020
- Which is more important to family or friends
- The Shwe Dagon Pagoda Yangon is worth a visit
- Are people really ready for Mars?
- English is a standard language
- Which healthy foods satisfy
- Why Are Middle Aged Indian Women Fat
- How safe is a lead solder
- Do people want to learn Chinese
- Why are sheets green 1
- Is it possible to deflect a bullet?
- Is the rainbow vacuum a scam
- Start-up costs for a solar installation business
- Is Gilbert Syndrome harmful?